logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고정4226
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who sells women’s uniforms with the trade name “E” in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 1st floor 111, and the victim F is a person who sells women’s uniforms with the trade name “G” in the above D 1st floor 112.

On June 18, 2013, the Defendant displayed the above CCTV screen image to H, the main owner of the store No. 443 of the above D1st floor, at the event site of the above D on the following day, and the victim was the victim of the said CCTV. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant displayed the above CCTV image to K from 7th of the J 1st floor in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and caused the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts with the intent of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of H and K;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of K;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. Around February 27, 2013, the summary of the facts charged reveals that “the victim, around February 26, 2013, shows CCTV screen pictures that take things from the above E store, which are recorded by the victim F, to L, an employee of “G” store located in the victim F,” thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts.

2. The following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, L’s written statement, stating that “Handphone images were shown.” The L’s written statement is merely “not to be seen as the end, but it was difficult to play.” Specifically, there is no indication on what is the Defendant’s statement of defamation about the victim, and L’s content is also visible in this court.

arrow