logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.01.29 2013가단53592
공사대금 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,329,740 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 8, 2013 to January 29, 2015.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff asserted that, around March 8, 2013, the Defendant agreed with the Defendant to pay KRW 30,000,000 for the expenses incurred in connection with the construction of a child-care center and the expenses incurred in relation to the construction of a child-care center. The Plaintiff claimed KRW 37,329,740 for the total of KRW 30,000 for the contract fees and KRW 67,329,740 for the construction of a child-care center.

B. 1) Recognition of the Defendant’s claim for the return of construction costs was based on an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on March 8, 2013 on the payment of the Plaintiff’s fee in addition to the Plaintiff’s fee after the Plaintiff’s acquisition of the remaining construction work and the completion and completion of the construction work. The Plaintiff completed the construction work from April 1, 2013 to June 12, 2013. The expenses incurred by the Plaintiff are the aggregate of KRW 47,273,650, and the expenses incurred by the Plaintiff collected KRW 9,943,910 among the construction materials and personnel expenses incurred by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff did not conflict between the parties and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, who was a construction business operator, and the remaining construction work was completed and completed, and the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff’s fee in addition to the expenses incurred by the Plaintiff after the completion of the construction work. The Plaintiff completed the construction work from April 1, 2013 to June 12, 2013.

C. The fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff’s remuneration for the completion of the construction project is as seen earlier, but whether the amount of remuneration was agreed to be KRW 30,00,000, as alleged by the Plaintiff, the health class, Gap’s evidence Nos. 5 and 6, and witness D and E.

arrow