Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 25, 2017, around 20:10 on September 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) she gets to drive along the road on the street in front of “G in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Gyeonggi-do; and (b) she gets to drive along the road on the road.”

In doing so, an assault was committed to the victim, such as brushing the victim's face in excess of the victim's face, and brushing twice the victim's head head back, which is a dangerous object, and bruting the victim's face, and committing an injury to the victim, such as a brush brush that requires three-day medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place as above 1 paragraph (1) of the same Article, was carried out as a trial cost, on the same grounds as above 1, and was carried out by hand on one occasion as the victim A(49 years of age)’s chest, which is a plastic chair, and was in need of two weeks’ treatment, and the victim sustained injury, such as inception and diagnosis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. A testimony of a witness;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter [the records reveal that one passage through one way and the two defendants are used for the purpose of actively shooting the other party as the plastic chairs in this case when the two persons are pushed on with the vision, and thus, the speaker of this case can find out the circumstances where the end of the bridge may lead to a scarcity in case of the destruction of plastic structure. In light of the Supreme Court's interpretation on the meaning of "hazardous goods" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Do2812, Sept. 6, 2002) as to the meaning of "hazardous goods" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Do2812, Sept. 6, 2002). Accordingly, the defendants and their defense counsels are not accepted.

In addition, Defendant B testified to the effect that he did not place the injured person through the last statement as plastic, through the consistent statement between this Court and the investigative agency of the injured person A.