logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.08.21 2016가단129479
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant C’s KRW 16,396,980 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 14, 2016 to August 21, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B is raising a dog at his own house located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and Defendant C is leasing part of the above house from Defendant B.

B. At around 19:30 on June 14, 2016, Defendant C moved back to the dog without Defendant B’s permission, and took a book, Defendant C was only the Plaintiff at the front of the road in Namyang-si.

However, the dog, where the dog was not opened, did not go to the plaintiff, carried on both sides of the plaintiff (hereinafter “the accident in this case”), and the plaintiff suffered from an injury, such as a diversative heat on the right side prior to the discharge to the right side, which requires treatment for about three weeks, a divers and a diversary operation.

C. Meanwhile, on April 5, 2018, Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 1 million due to the crime of injury by negligence due to the instant accident.

(No. 2017 High Court Decision 1413. [Reasons for Recognition] A; the entries and images of evidence No. 8, 9, and 22; the significant facts to this Court; the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant B either disposed of the dog although he had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 6 of the judgment of the court below, Defendant B’s opening seems to have existed prior to the instant accident.

However, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, Defendant B was raising on the flag side by combining lines in the parallels, and Defendant C did not obtain the permission of Defendant B. The instant accident is without the permission of Defendant C.

arrow