logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.22 2016누43819
간주취득세 부과처분 취소 청구
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On July 11, 2008 and around April 2, 2013, the company of this case purchased the following contents from around 3, 2008 to around 3, 200, and purchased the land (the book value shall be 7,911,380,000) held by it on April 2, 201, 5 of the first instance judgment, and "6," "5," and "5," were "(including 4,00,000; hereinafter the same shall apply)" from the first instance judgment 6, 4,00 to 3,00,000,000,000,000 and 3,000,000,000,000 and 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

arrow