1. The defendant B shall be dismissed from office as the administrator of the defendant Cata Steering Committee.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

1. The Plaintiff, without dispute, is one of the sectional owners in Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si, the Plaintiff is the management body under the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggregate-si Act”), which consists of sectional owners in C, and since the Defendant B was appointed as the management body of the Defendant management body on February 2014, it manages C commercial price as the management body until now.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant B performed the following act while performing his duties as the manager of the Defendant managing body. It constitutes “when there are circumstances that make it inappropriate for Defendant B to perform unfair acts or other duties” under Article 24(5) of the Aggregate Buildings Act, and thus, Defendant B should be dismissed from office as the manager of the Defendant managing body.

1) At the time of being elected in 2004, Defendant B was not a sectional owner, and was not elected by the resolution at the meeting of the management body at that time, and was illegally elected by the management committee members. Defendant B reappointed the president for 12 years and did not hold a general meeting to elect the president. On March 17, 2014, Defendant B rejected the issuance of a certified copy despite the Plaintiff’s request for data on the imposition, etc. of management expenses around November 14, 201, even though Defendant B rejected the Plaintiff’s request for data on the imposition, etc. of management expenses, Defendant B rejected the Plaintiff’s request for inspection and inspection of the management rules, and the Plaintiff rejected the request for inspection and inspection of all kinds of data, such as the Plaintiff’s request for perusal of a contract with the bank management company, which is an entrusted management company of C at the regular general meeting.

3. The defendant B amended the management rules on August 31, 2009 without the resolution of the management body meeting, and did not meet the majority of the quorum at the time.