The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant recognized the instant crime and is in profoundly against the Defendant, and there is no particular criminal record after 197.

However, in the event that a vehicle is operated without the registration of transfer of ownership on a motor vehicle, it would hinder the state's automobile management business, such as the imposition of fines for negligence on violation of laws and regulations, the collection of automobile tax, etc., and it is necessary to strictly prohibit it since it may be abused for various crimes due to the distribution of 'bold vehicle'. In light of the legislative intent of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the running of a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory

In addition, there is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment because new sentencing data is not submitted in the trial.

In full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.