Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

A. On October 14, 2014, the Defendants jointly expressed a 'E hotel located in D' on the front of the 'E hotel located in D' on the 'E hotel located in D' on the front of the Government-si on the ground that the victim F (37 years of age) refused the taking of a taxi and that he was taking meals, and expressed a 'Chewing, Chewing, pacting, and string away of the distance,’ from the victim, “I am hing down the bath, hinging, and string,” and hing down the victim’s hinging the victim’s ma at one time with his hand, and the Defendant B assaulted the victim’s hing the victim’s fat.

B. The Defendants jointly carried the F at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1(a) at the time, and at the place, and as described in paragraph 1(a), the victim G (58 years of age) who is a taxi engineer of different fee 58 years of age had the said F on his taxi, and had the said F on board the taxi, Defendant B opened a driver’s seat and opened a drinking-water so that the number of backs of the victim can be taken once by drinking, Defendant A took the victim’s clothes out of the train, and assaulted the victim in excess of the floor by pushing the victim on two hand.

2. The Defendants jointly and severally damaged the date and time indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1, and at the place, Defendant A her walked one time to walk the victim G’s right side of H-si, and Defendant B damaged the victim’s right side of the said taxi by making the front part of the pent by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and I;

1. A photograph of damaged vehicles, photograph of damaged vehicles, and written estimate of expenses incurred in repairing vehicles;

1. Each investigation report (attached Table 112 for handling of reported cases, and investigation by the counter party of the reporter in 112);

1. The Defendants and their defense counsel asserted that the Defendants did not jointly assault the victims or destroy a taxi. However, the victims F and G statements are consistent from the investigative agency to the investigation agency to this court, witness I's statements are consistent with the victims' statements, and the defendants are consistent with the victims' statements.