A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of fraud in attached Table 4 is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

around March 31, 2008, the Defendant of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2016 order 1161 returned to D before the due date of payment of the bill, if it is necessary to purchase the solar power site in the Republic of Korea, at the Defendant’s office located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B building C.

“The phrase “ was false.”

D Trusting that end, on March 31, 2008, 2000 won a promissory note of KRW 30 million was placed on the defendant.

However, the Defendant was invested in KRW 45 million by investors E for the purpose of manufacturing and selling health assistive foods. On August 8, 2007, the Defendant purchased KRW 81,025 square meters of the Daegu Suwon-gu F.81,025 square meters of the investment money collected through E under the name of solar energy business, but was unable to promote solar energy business. However, the Defendant returned the land purchased to investors since there was no special property or income, and even if the Defendant borrowed promissory notes to the victim, there was no possibility or ability to recover the bills or pay the face value thereof within the due date of payment of the bills.

From this point to June 25, 2008, the Defendant acquired promissory notes with a total of KRW 125 million by deceiving the victim D at a total of five times, such as the statement Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 of the List of Crimes.

around October 5, 2009, the Defendant: “Around October 5, 2009, the 2016 Highest 1831, the Defendant, at the G Office operated by the Defendant in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, lent money as security by H; “Along with the fourth floor of the Seoyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Itel, to lend money as security”; “Along with the supply contract to B, the Defendant would create money as security.”

“.....”

K trusted the end of the Itel, and gave the defendant a contract for supply (Evidence of Sale) with respect to the 4th floor J of K of the Itel.

However, even if the Defendant received the supply contract, the Defendant did not have any idea or ability to lend money.

The defendant is owned by the victim H by deceiving K.