1. The Defendant stated each claim amount column in the separate sheet for each Plaintiff’s claim amount in the separate sheet to the Plaintiffs, and as to this, on May 2015.

1. The assertion;

A. The Plaintiffs asserted 1) The Plaintiffs are workers employed by the Defendant, who perform patient care, diagnosis, receipt of outpatients, radiation photographing, nuclear medical examination, diagnosis, and administrative affairs. 2) The Gyeongbuk Hospital Branch of the Medical Services Industry Union, which is the labor union to which the Plaintiffs belong, was designated as the full-time strike for about 35 days from November 27, 2014 to December 31 of the same year, and the 13-day from January 1, 2015 to January 13, 2015 to the full-time strike for labor union members.

However, with respect to the plaintiffs who participated in the strike during the period of the strike, the defendant did not pay a good-time allowance (hereinafter referred to as the " good-time allowance") to be paid on January 2015, 2015, on the ground that the defendant would be in accordance with the principle of no labor-free wages.

3) However, Article 8 (Allowances) of the Defendant’s Remuneration Regulations provides that ① a full-time officer or employee shall be paid a fixed-time allowance according to the classification of payments in attached Table 3 on the date of January and July. ② A full-time allowance shall be paid to the person who holds the status of a full-time officer or employee as of the date of payment of the allowance and who is paid the remuneration from the 1st day of the month preceding the month of payment, but the Defendant did not pay the instant fixed-time allowance without any grounds for the Plaintiffs’ participation in the strike. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs are entitled to pay each amount indicated in the claim amount column for each claim amount sheet for each Plaintiff’s claim calculated in accordance with the Defendant’s remuneration regulations, etc., from February 1, 2015 to September 19, 2016, the delivery date of a copy of the application for modification of the claim of this case, and the amount calculated at 15% per annum from the following day to the day of full payment.

B. The defendant's alleged plaintiffs met the requirements prescribed in the former part of Article 8 (2) of the defendant's remuneration regulations, but the latter part of the defendant's assertion did not meet the requirements of "the person who is paid the remuneration from the first day of the month preceding the month in which