The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates B (hereinafter referred to as “B”).

The Defendant received automobile goods from the victim D, the victim F, the victim F, the victim H, the victim H, the victim H, and the victim J operating the company, who operated the company C, and supplied the vehicle goods to K in the United States (hereinafter “K”).

On June 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D at the instant factory located in Daegu Northern-gu L, Daegu-gu L, stating that “When the Defendant supplies automobile parts, the Defendant would necessarily pay the price for the goods on two days back after the second month from the delivery date.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to pay the price for the goods that he received from the subcontractor including the victim D due to the lack of assets. The Defendant thought that the money that he received from the above K would not be paid to the victims, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the goods normally within the period, even if he received the automobile parts from the victim D.

The Defendant received 96,00 U.S. dollars 2,112 from the victim D on June 4, 2010, and received 96,00 U.S. dollars 2,112 from the victim D, and did not pay the amount, even if the Defendant received 481,425.83 U.S. dollars 481,425.83 U.S. dollars 508,128,430, respectively, as shown in the attached crime sight table 1 through 4.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

Maz.

1. As stated in the facts charged, the fact that the defendant and the defense counsel followed transaction with the victims of the instant case and received the parts of the automobile from the victims, and the fact that they failed to pay the amount is recognized.

However, if the defendant did not pay the victims at the time, K supplied the victims' goods through the defendant.