The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is required to obtain three-time blood dosages per week with a kidy disability with a kidy disability, the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, and the fact that the accident was not caused by the driving of

However, in the past, the defendant had been punished several times due to the same or similar crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment, five times of fines) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment). The defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence) on November 6, 2008. The defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence on November 14, 2008, which became final and conclusive on November 24, 2008, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence on January 5, 2009, and the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the above violation of the Road Traffic Act (one day of suspended sentence of imprisonment and one time of a fine). The defendant had already been sentenced to a summary order on June 1, 201, and the defendant had already been sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.2 million on July 18, 2019.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is reasonable, and it is reversed, and it is decided as follows through pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and criminal facts against the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence is the same as that of the judgment of the court below.