The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) has experienced the victim depending on the defendant, and there was no assault against the victim as a drinking, while the defendant was saluting the defendant.

2. The judgment of the court below is justified in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, considering the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim's act from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to consistently stated to the effect that "the defendant was at the time of drinking," ② the victim complained of the victim's pain by visiting the Mady division on the following day of this case; ② the victim was diagnosed as the victim's body by visiting the Mady division; ③ X-ray photographing; ③ the defendant was diagnosed as a self-defense; ③ the defendant argued to the effect that the contact with the victim was self-defense; however, considering the situation at the time of this case and the degree of injury suffered by the victim, the defendant's act is not a mere means of defense, but a means of attack; and there is no violation of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.