logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.10.30 2013나60410
보증금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant Shin Young-young in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The current status of the new construction, possession, and use of the instant building 1) The Jind Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Pind”)

2) On January 2, 201, 200

Around October 2006, 2006, the Seoul Jung-gu and seven lots of ground G commercial building (hereinafter “instant building”).

After the new construction of the building, the preservation registration of the building of this case was completed with 1/2 shares in each of the 1/2 shares. 2) Round and Robcom primarily borrowed funds from a foreign bank called “Macoba (Wacoba)” to implement the new construction of the building of this case, and partially borrowed funds from the bonds company. Since the sale of the building after the construction of the building of this case did not proceed smoothly and did not repay the borrowed money, the public sale procedure was conducted, and the more Bloca’s investment in Macoa is the abbreviation of WREK REWE Korea.

Redwater

I. LC, hereinafter referred to as WREK

(3) On the other hand, from November 2008 to the third floor of the building of this case, the company "non-urban area" enters each of the 8th floor of the building of this case, "the name of RacMMM changes" from June 2009 to the 8th floor of the building of this case. The above company arbitrarily leased the section for common use of the building of this case to the lessee and received deposits and rents from the lessee, or arranged the lease contract of the section for exclusive use of the building of this case, and received deposits and rents from the lessee to transfer the difference to the sectional owner, so that the company acquired the difference.

4 Following the acquisition of the instant building shares by WREK, the building of this case is located with the shop occupants who directly entered into a lease agreement with the sectional owners, but with the United States or LIMC.

arrow