The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (defendants) is too unreasonable that the sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. As long as the Defendant completed the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, each of the crimes of this case is committed, the Defendant committed a crime of this case, such as having not recovered from damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, having been provided alcoholic beverages, etc. without paying the price, or having an influence, and having repeatedly committed a crime, such as having been punished several times of imprisonment with prison labor as well as imprisonment with prison labor.

On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as that the defendant reflects the wrong and that the individual amount of damage is not high.

In full view of these circumstances, all of the sentencing conditions and the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines as shown in the instant argument, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.