The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts filed a complaint by forging a written agreement on division of inherited property by forging a written agreement on division of inherited property under G name, but the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding of facts. 2) The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The court below rejected the above argument in the "judgment on the defendant's argument" part of the "judgment on the defendant's argument" as stated in its reasoning on the ground that the defendant made the same argument as that of this part in the judgment of the court below. If the above judgment of the court below is examined closely by comparing the above judgment with the records, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case is just and it does not seem that there is an

Defendant

The defense counsel stated at the trial that G received the amount of money equivalent to the agreed amount set forth in the letter of agreement on the division of the inherited property of this case from the defendant. Although G indicates that it purchased the land of this case from the defendant, G, unlike the contents of the above letter of agreement, in light of the fact that it stated that it was a title trust by the defendant that the land of this case was held by the defendant, the above letter of agreement should be deemed forged. However, the real estate title trust can be deemed a nominal trust, and the real estate title trust can be conducted in the form of sale, and the defendant was issued with a certificate of seal for the sale of real estate on April 17, 2009. The real estate purchaser column was written in G, while the defendant consistently asserted that the land of this case was the property owned by the defendant inherited by the defendant by the investigative agency up to this court