logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.04 2014가단5136919
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On May 10, 1912, the underlying facts B was examined as follows: (a) around 381 square meters (hereinafter “C before division”) prior to the Gyeonggi-gun (hereinafter “Ycheon-si”); and (b) around 10, 191, the name of the administrative district was changed to “Ycheon-si”); (c)

Before subdivision, C was divided into 280 square meters (926 square meters; hereinafter “D land before subdivision”) and E large 101 square meters (334 square meters) in E-si, Leecheon-si (which appears to have been at the time of distributing farmland under the Farmland Reform Act). From D land before subdivision on or around November 28, 1959, F Return 14 square meters (476 square meters; hereinafter “F land before subdivision”) was divided from D land before subdivision; on November 28, 1974, G return 56 square meters was divided from F land before subdivision; on the other hand, some of the land before subdivisions changes land category; on the other hand, the land after subdivision or alteration of land category is recorded in D large 450 square meters (attached Table 1; hereinafter “D land”); and on the other hand, the list of G land and 343 square meters and 450 square meters (attached Form 342, 450 square meters) in G land (hereinafter “D land”).

(Total the real estate stated in the attached list is collectively referred to as "each land of this case." The defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership of the land of this case by the Suwon District Court, Leecheon District Court, Leecheon District Court, No. 856, Jun. 30, 1956, as to the land of this case, the registration of preservation of ownership of the F land of this case and the G land of this case, the Suwon District Court, Leecheon District Court, Leecheon District Court No. 7989, Aug. 29,

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, A1, 4 through 7, B, 2, 3, 7 (including each number if there is a serial number), the purport of the whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) H, who is the father of the Plaintiff, received the D’s land before subdivision from the Defendant as a distributed farmland, and completed the repayment on December 20, 1959. 2) H died on June 7, 1968. The Plaintiff, the father of H, was inherited by Australia, and the Plaintiff, the father of H, the wife of H, i, children, J, K, L, M, N,O, etc.

arrow