logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.08.05 2020고정969
건조물침입
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:00 on November 19, 2019, the Defendant, on the same day, entered the first floor of officetels in Gangnam-gu Seoul building, wherein C resides in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and kept a peace in residence by opening the entrance door of D, which is the victim’s residence, without any reason, at around 03:00 on the same day, and continuously opening the door door of the victim’s residence at around 05:00 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Investigation report ( telephone communications of a victim);

1. An attempted report on the occurrence of a house;

1. Investigation report (to make a statement by a police officer at the site);

1. Investigation reports (verification of credibility of statements of a suspect);

1. Details of inspection by relocating households;

1. To attach a report of investigation (a photograph of the certified copy of register);

1. Investigation report (to have telephone conversations for witnesses);

1. Investigation report ( telephone conversations with a suspect);

1. A report on investigation (a statement of suspect's mother);

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of investigation report (on the spot parking site and CCTV for elevators, etc.)

1. The Defendant’s summary of the assertion is to find the victim after the telephone call to issue (to substitute) the house of the friendship in Seoul building BF of Gangnam-gu Seoul building B, and it was to find out the victim again on the new wall that the victim knew of who is not a friendly Gu, and to the end that the victim was sent a thickness, and there was no intention to intrude on the structure.

2. However, the judgment is based on the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated, that is, the defendant sent a door door to the residence of the victim who is string at around 03:00 on November 19, 2019, and divided the first race. The victim reported 112 immediately, the police officer returned back to the police officer, and the defendant sent a door to the residence of the victim again at around 05:00 on the same day. In this regard, the defendant found G, H and I residing in the above F, and received from G to the police officer, and received from G. D.

arrow