beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.10 2017가단138
제3자이의의 소
Text
1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the payment order finalized on October 12, 2016 by Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) 2016 tea 72657.
Reasons
1. Since movable property in the separate list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the above movable property by compulsory execution based on the payment order (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016Hu72657) against B. 2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act)