logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.03.30 2017고단377
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The structure of the crime of fraud of lending money to false workers by leasing national land shall operate the system of lending money to workers who borrow money from the National Housing Fund at a rate lower than the market interest rate if an application for a loan is filed with only specified documents, such as a certificate of employment, a statement of salary, etc., and a written lease contract, without any special security, to stabilize the residence of homeless workers with the financial resources of the National Housing

그러나 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출 관련 업무를 위탁 받은 금융기관이 형식적인 심사만 하고 대출을 해 준다는 사실을 알고, 대출 브로커들은 허위로 임차인과 임대인 역할을 하는 사람들과 함께 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출금을 가로챌 것을 모의하였다.

Accordingly, loan broskers held false employment-related documents and false details related to a lessee as a person holding the name of the lending, and held false documents to the lessee who will perform the lease. The false lessee, as above, submitted documents related to the falsely prepared employment and the written contract for the lease of a house to the financial institution, and applied for the lease of a house to the employee while applying for the lease of a house, and the false lessor who will perform the lease of a house enters the request of the financial institution to verify the existence of the contract for the lease of a house when the lessor enters into the request of the financial institution to confirm the existence of the contract for the lease of a house, the lessor, while applying for the lease of a house of a house of the employee,

2. Specific facts constituting a crime committed by the Defendant, along with the brode of the fraudulent loan, whose name is unknown as a false lessee, was given the employee’s deposit money by the above method, and conspired in order to have it divided.

A loan hub with which the name can not be identified through the above public offering is falsely prepared by the defendant as if the defendant worked in the "C" company around September 2012, 201.

arrow