A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 21, 2013, the Defendant injured the Victim C at around 01:40, at the “E” main point operated by the Victim C (Y, 42 years of age) located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (a) ordered alcohol; (b) had the victim listened to the horses that the business was completed by the victim; and (c) had the victim avoided the victim’s head one time by drinking.

Then, the defendant wanted to go from the above main point, but had the victim teared in a hand, hand, and so on.

As a result, the Defendant got off a face-to-face in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant who injured the Victim F was trying to move the place in front of the main point above the time point mentioned in paragraph 1, but was able to get her back from the Victim F (ma, 49 years old), who was the main customer of the above C, and her own her own her own her own her own her own herth herth herth herth herth herth herth herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst th

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement C by witnesses in the fourth protocol of trial;

1. The part concerning the statement C and F in the prosecution examination protocol against the defendant

1. The part concerning the statement C or F in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (C) and the entrustment review report (F);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was not restored to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence, there were no records of punishment except for the Defendant’s previous offense of this case, which resulted in a minor injury to the victim C, the Defendant’s contingent crime of this case, one time of fine (the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act on August 7, 2009). The background of the instant crime and the degree of injury to the victim.