Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2017, the Defendant purchased a used vehicle trading company with no knowledge of the trade name in the vicinity of the Suwon-si Station, and entered into an agreement to pay KRW 619,970 per month from the victim C for the 60-month period from the used vehicle trading company with no knowledge of the trade name in the vicinity of the Suwon-si Station, and received loans of KRW 25 million on September 1, 2017, and established a mortgage over the claim value of KRW 12,500,000 as the mortgagee on the above vehicle.

Since March 2018, the Defendant, while failing to pay the installment of the loan from around April 2018, delivered the said vehicle to D as a collateral for the borrowed amount of four million won, making it impossible to identify the location of the said vehicle. On June 21, 2018, the Defendant refused the victim’s request for delivery on or around June 21, 2018, concealed the said vehicle that became the object of the victim’s right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Preparation and report of each recording book;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the mid- and long-term debate and the automobile mortgage creation contract;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act and Article 323 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act was not recovered, and that a summary order was issued due to a partial reduction of the amount claimed by the prosecutor’s summary order (five million won) stated in the indictment, etc., considering the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant trial, it does not seem that the amount of fine specified in the summary order is excessive even if considering the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant trial.