The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no illegality such as exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or using as evidence of guilt.

In addition, in light of the records, it is difficult to see that the defendant's defense right has been infringed due to the refusal to allow the reading and copying of the trial records of the court of the first instance and the court of the original instance, and there is no violation of law

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is permitted only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is sentenced, and thus, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence is unfair

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.