A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On 17:48 on 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C in Ulleung-gun B on 17:48, the Defendant took a bath to customers with the large voice of “I am out”; (b) continued to see customers as “I am out of this weather”; and (c) attempted to wn with customers, with the large voice of “I am going to go to go to, and to go to, them, so the Defendant was unable to avoid a disturbance for one hour by having customers go to go to the restaurant.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Apr. 1,

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;