logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2017.06.22 2017고정14
과실치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000 if the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant got the hululh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh hulh.

In the case of the hulule fishing, the method of catching the body of the water apparatus is used by the method of cutting the body of the water apparatus by using the number of gulging without the baits, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely increasing the fishing market price by checking the left and right well before and after the fishing market in the process of growing the fishing market.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had been engaged in the fishing market without examining the right before and after, and had the Defendant enter the fishing market to the fishing market line, and had the fiff ff f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Request for cooperation in investigation (request for cooperation in emergency medical services) and destination of emergency medical services activities;

1. In the investigation report (119 emergency medical service personnel F. F. and witness F. Report) / The defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that the victim was injured only by the victim's own negligence and that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant against the injury of the victim.

However, the following circumstances recognized by legitimate evidence of this Court, i.e., sublime hulule fishing, which is larger than the general fishing time than the general fishing time.

The method of fishing is also purely gathering, and there is another person in the surrounding area. The defendant was well aware of the fact that he had a lot of experience in hulcopsing, and the defendant was well aware of such fact. ② Nevertheless, the defendant had a direction of causing damage to the fishing market price without maintaining a proper safety distance with the victim. ③ At the time of the case, the defendant and the victim were engaged in hulcopsing, and the accident occurred immediately after the accident occurred.

arrow