Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

In order to raise the money to pay a fine, the Defendants made soup soup, stolen a mobile phone, cut the mobile phone, and enter the sobry “D” kitchen located in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si on November 10, 2013. On the other hand, at around 03:00 on November 10, 2013, the Defendants stolen the gap in surveillance and stolen the stolen mobile phone, and then stolen the mobile phone again in advance, and cut off four mobile phones in total amount of KRW 3,79,900, the market price of the victims owned by the following items.

1. At around 05:20 on November 10, 2013, Defendant B: (a) stolen one cellular phone of Samsung Ggalthom, which is equivalent to KRW 950,000, in the market price owned by the victim’s head, who was placed in the custody of the victim’s head by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance negligence due to the victim E being divingd; (b) around 05:20 on November 10, 201.

2. On November 10, 2013, Defendant A returned to the above D, and the victim F was locked, and Defendant A stolen one cell phone from the victim’s market price, which is equivalent to KRW 900,000, which was located around the victim’s neighboring areas by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance negligence.

3. At around 05:36, Nov. 10, 2013, Defendant B: (a) stolen one cell phone (LTE) of the victim-owned juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based juthy-based justy-based justy-based justy (S) just (HTE)-based justy-based justy-based

4. At around 05:40 on November 10, 2013, Defendant A stolen one mobile phone (R 3) of the market price equivalent to KRW 99,900, the victim’s market price owned by the victim, which was located around the victim, by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance negligence due to the victim H was locked.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement in E, F, H and G preparation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;