1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following determination as to the plaintiff's re-appeal against the defendant's defense of extinctive prescription, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The court of first instance determined that the Defendant’s defense of extinctive prescription was well-grounded.

As to this, the plaintiff asserts that "after the business of contact lenses import and sale was nonexistent, the defendant continued to promise the return of the investment amount to the plaintiff for a period exceeding 20 years, so the plaintiff's right to claim the return of the investment amount was suspended by the debt approval." However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's above assertion.

The plaintiff's second defense is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.