1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B is the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

(a)payment of 586,580 won;

(b) Chungcheongnam-Nam from July 11, 2015.

1. Determination on the main claim

가. 부당이득반환청구에 대한 판단 갑 제1 내지 4호증의 각 기재와 이 법원의 현장검증결과 및 변론 전체의 취지에 의하면, 원고가 2013. 7. 24. 충남 태안군 D 임야 3141㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 1 내지 29, 1의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 575㎡와 E 임야 146㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 30 내지 34, 30의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈏부분 31㎡, 별지 도면 표시 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 31의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈐부분 67㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 토지’)에 대한 소유권을 취득한 사실, 피고 B가 ㈎부분과 ㈏부분을 통행로로, ㈐부분 지상에 구조물 등의 설치로 점유사용하다가 2014. 11. 18. ㈐부분 지상 구조물을 모두 철거한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to return unjust enrichment to the Plaintiff for occupying and using the land owned by the Plaintiff.

Defendant B asserts that the Plaintiff did not have a duty to return unjust enrichment by asserting that the Plaintiff gave up his exclusive and exclusive right to use.

In a case where a certain private land is naturally occurring or is classified into a proposed road site and actually used as a public road for the traffic of the general public, if the owner of the land grants the right to free traffic to neighboring residents or the general public by providing the land as a road, or if interpreting that he/she gives the right to exclusively use and benefit from the land, he/she shall contribute to the effective use and benefit of the remaining land partitioned and sold for the purpose of the efficient use of and benefit from the land as well as various circumstances, such as the circumstance or period he/she owns the land, the details and scale of the sale of the remaining land in installments, the location and nature of the land to be used as the road, the relationship with neighboring land, and the surrounding environment.