logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.06.24 2013고정897
직업안정법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with a Special Self-Governing Province Governor or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without the aforementioned registration from July 201 to December 30, 201 of the same year, conducted fee-charging job placement services by collecting a person to be engaged in delivery under the trade name, "D", "E", "F", etc. from the early police officer from the beginning of July 201 to the beginning of December 30, 201 of the same year, and then introducing them to the restaurants, such as "E", "F, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statements made by witnesses G in the fourth trial records;

1. Statements of witnesses H and I in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statement of the police statement to J;

1. Each statement (Evidence Nos. 4);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the Employment Security Act and Article 19 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without the aforementioned registration from July 201 to December 30, 201 of the same year, conducted fee-charging job placement services by collecting a person to be engaged in delivery under the trade name, "D", "E", "F", etc. from the beginning of the beginning of July 201 to the beginning of December 30, 201 of the same year, and then introducing them to the restaurants, such as "E", "F", and then receiving a fee of KRW 70,000 per case.

2. According to the evidence presented prior to the determination, the fact that the defendant received a certain amount of fee from the delivery source in return for the introduction of the delivery source is insufficient to recognize the fact that the amount reaches KRW 70,000 per case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, it is necessary.

arrow