The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below may take account of the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and is against the defendant, the victim D and the court below's agreement between the victim F and each victim's victim F and the court below that each victim does not want punishment against the defendant. However, the defendant has many records of punishment for larceny or intrusion upon residence. In particular, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of three years on or around 2006, and the execution of the sentence was completed, and the crime of this case was committed during the repeated crime period. The crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the crime of this case in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) among the crime of this case is punishable by imprisonment with prison labor for a limited term of not less than one year, the court below set the punishment by the court below, taking into account the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, the circumstances of the crime of this case, and

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.