1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of the pertinent parts as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

(a) Forms 9 and 15 of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed by the following:

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the fact that the plaintiff lent 20 million won to the defendant at an interest rate of 2% per month in 2000, and the loan of 30 million won at an interest rate of 2% per month in October 2005 can be recognized.

(1) The plaintiff alleged that the loan of KRW 30 million to the defendant was around 200, but there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, the plaintiff asserted that the loan of KRW 50 million was made on February 5, 2015 at the complaint of February 5, 2015, and that the loan of KRW 20 million was made on two occasions, and that the loan of KRW 30 million was made on two occasions, and that the loan of KRW 30 million was different. In the application for correction of the complaint of February 23, 2015, the plaintiff argued that the loan of KRW 30 million was made on October 31, 200, and that the loan of KRW 30 million was made on February 1, 205, and the defendant also asserted that the loan of KRW 30 million was made on February 20, 2005, and that the loan of KRW 200,000 to the defendant on February 29, 2005.

As to this, the Plaintiff.