Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. No debt collector shall commit any act seriously undermining privacy or peace in business by demanding any person, other than a debtor, who is not legally obligated to repay a debt without justifiable grounds, to repay a debt on behalf of a debtor, in connection with debt collection, to arouse fear or apprehension;

Nevertheless, as the Defendant could not receive KRW 27 million lent to the husband D by the victim C, the Defendant found the victim and instructed the victim to settle D's debt, and on October 3, 2019, the Defendant found the victim as the beauty room operated by the victim and ordered the victim to complete the debt.

Accordingly, A around 10:00 on October 4, 2019, around 10:0, he was unable to avoid disturbance for about one hour, including: (a) the great sound before the F Beauty Room operated by the victim in Sinsi-si, “I would have gone to the crime of assault, and would have come to the suspension of execution; (b) how the agreement was made; and (c) where the money was paid,” and (d) he was unable to avoid disturbance for about two hours from around 10:0 on October 8, 2019 to around 10:0 on October 9, 2019 to the same method.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated A to commit an act that seriously undermines peace in business by demanding a victim who does not have any legal obligation to repay his/her obligation on behalf of the debtor to pay his/her obligation, thereby inducing fear or apprehension.

2. According to the above teachers listed in B, Defendant A avoided disturbance for about one hour, including: (a) around 10:00 on October 4, 2019, in front of the F Beauty room operated by the victim in Singuh City, and (b) “I would like to have been under the suspension of the execution of the execution of the execution of the sentence, as to whether I would have entered the F Beauty, and how I would have made the agreement or where I would have reached the agreement; and (c) in the same way, Defendant A was able to avoid disturbance for about two hours from around 10:00 on October 8, 2019 to around 10:00 on October 9, 2019 to avoid disturbance for about one hour.