Text
The judgment below
The part of the 2015 order 555 order of judgment shall be reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and four months.
Reasons
1. Scope of trial after remand;
A. The lower court sentenced Defendant to the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for a crime 55 group of 2015 group of 2015 group of 555 group of 2015 group of 2015 group of 2015 group of 653 group of 2015 group of 2015 group of the lower judgment, and sentenced Defendant to the dismissal of a public prosecution for each of the instant facts charged, and only the Defendant appealed the guilty portion of the lower judgment, and the dismissed part of the lower judgment
B. B. Before remand, the lower court prior to remand reversed the part of the lower judgment on the conviction for the crime of 2015 order 653 which was decided by the lower court, and sentenced the relevant portion to one month, and sentenced to the dismissal of an appeal against the crime of 555 senior group as decided by the lower court. The Defendant appealed against the lower court prior to remand. The Supreme Court reversed the part on the crime of 2015 senior group 5555 of the lower judgment ex officio, and dismissed the appeal against the remainder, and the remaining part of the lower judgment, excluding the part on the crime of 2015 senior group 5555 of the lower judgment against the Defendant, was separately finalized.
(c)
Ultimately, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the 2015 senior 555 of the judgment of the court below.
2. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant was in the state of mental and physical weakness or loss of mental and physical disorder due to the main or mental illness at the time of committing a part of 2015 high group of 555 crimes as indicated in the lower judgment.
B. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months) against the 2015 highest order of 555 of the lower judgment’s holding that the sentencing is unfair is too unreasonable.
3. Determination
A. Determination ex officio (Changes in Indictment) 1) We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.
Article 3(1) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act apply to the name of the crime (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) committed in the course of the trial for the first time, the Prosecutor shall be deemed to be “special injury” and Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act of the same Act.