Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:30 on December 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a 2nd floor office located in C in C in Silung City, in order to resisting that the Defendant was notified of retirement from the Defendant; (b) opened the entrance of the victim E and the entrance of the office that had been able to look into the office before the opening of the office; (c) in order to enter the office before the opening of the office, the head of the victim’s head was recorded in a pipe between the door and the door of the victim, which could be anticipated that the above situation may occur if the victim again entered the said office, but the head of the victim was in a state between the victim and the end of the time while the victim was in a state where the head of the second victim was kid, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 262 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 262 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. As to the assertion of denial of intention and person-related relationship, the Defendant and his defense counsel checked the door to prevent the Defendant from infringing upon the victim’s residence at the time. However, the victim’s head was merely a pipe of the victim’s head by reducing his/her head by pushing ahead with his/her head, and thus, the Defendant did not have intention to commit the act of assault, or did not have a causal relation between the assault

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, this part of the facts charged can be fully acknowledged.

(1) The defendant may be recognized by the prosecutor that he/she has sealed two seconds of the face of the victim, even though he/she confirmed that the face of the victim has been laid (the second).

However, at the time, he did that act with interest in the situation.

“.....”