A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:30, the Defendant: (b) had been working at the “E” store operated by the Victim D (Age 43), the father of C, who is the father of C, who is the father of C, who was in public city B; and (c) had a card size, one telephone terminal, and one telephone terminal installed on the floor, thereby damaging property equivalent to KRW 260,000, the market price of the victim’s possession.

2. Around 03:00 on March 24, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) stated that “H” heading toilets located in G “H”, “I would have to find out F known to the victim C (the age of 17)”; (b) provided that the victim’s face with drinking and hand-on floor would tear at approximately 30 times when the victim’s face is c0 times; and (c) inflicted an injury on the victim during treatment days, such as having the victim tear around her face.

3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury, etc.) was committed by the Defendant, upon receiving a request for appearance from the International District Police Organization of the Official Police Station to investigate the crime of injury under paragraph 2, he thought that the Defendant was subject to investigation due to C, and had the Defendant

On March 25, 2013, at around 00:07, the Defendant called “E” to the victim C, “E”, and collected the victim’s finites and finites disease, etc., and caused damage to the victim’s face by drinking finites and finites disease, etc.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of investigation reports, statements, etc. in connection with the investigation of his criminal case.

4. On March 25, 2013, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of assaulting C, such as paragraph (3), on the street, and was broken off to the back seat of the J, which is a patrol vehicle of the I district police station, and then broken off a glass window of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged public goods equivalent to the market price of 88,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. against C and K.