logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고단2499
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was a person who is receiving mental treatment due to a stimulative disorder, tidal disorder, etc., and (b) sought to board his own seat, which was parked on the side, with the driver of a 25 tons truck driver of the 25 tons truck who was going behind, with the view to the safety of the Defendant, at around 15:00 on March 8, 2014, the Defendant was able to take a warning.

The Defendant: (a) had the victim resisted to resist the damaged vehicle on the ground that the victim’s sound is bad due to play; (b) had the victim drive his/her motor vehicle; (c) rapidly changed the vehicle in the future of the damaged vehicle; (d) had the victim set up the cargo vehicle at a speed; and (e) had the victim take a bath to the victim who gets off the cargo vehicle; (c) flicked the victim’s chest on one hand; and (d) flicked him/her by hand.

2. On March 18, 2014, the Defendant requested the replacement of an investigator on the ground that the method of investigation by the police officer of the D police station in charge of the foregoing assault case was not in mind, but did not accept the request, and the Defendant sought to the D police station located in E around 09:30 on March 18, 2014 in order to resist it.

Around 09:40 on March 18, 2014, the Defendant found the library room on the second floor of the pertinent police station as an attached room, and expressed the police officer’s proposal to open the door room and open the door to the door, and opened the door to the seat of the police officer in charge of the document examination, and expressed the F of the police station in charge of the document examination to “I sphere, sphere, sphere, sphere, sphere, sphere, and sphere at monthly level.” From the above book, the Defendant expressed that “I sphere, I sphere, I sphere, I sphere, and sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere I sphere Isp.

arrow
유사 판례