1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasoning for this case is as follows, except for the addition of some contents, and thus, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

B. The following is added to the three-dimensional four (3) written judgment of the court of first instance.

The plaintiff asserts that, due to the special circumstance that the victimized child, who was her own car and caused his death, is the child of the father with limited rank, there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff has a sufficient ground for persecution, which is a nationality state.

However, the Plaintiff did not submit objective data to support the Plaintiff’s assertion in addition to the notice of disposition issued by the Ministry of Justice, and cannot be deemed as having suffered or is likely to suffer persecution to the extent that it can serve as the basis for recognition of refugee status even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined.

According to this, the plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.