logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.06.23 2016고단1975
사기
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months and for not more than one month for the crimes of No. 1, 2, or 3 in the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on September 22, 2009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 11, 2010. On March 5, 2015, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years to imprisonment for attempted fraud, etc. on October 29, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 2015.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On April 7, 2008, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim D with the period of KRW 25 million and KRW 250,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the Defendant, at the time, sold the above apartment under the name of F Co., Ltd. F (Representative G) actually operated by the Defendant, but the sale price was thought to depend on the tenant’s funds, such as the deposit money, and did not transfer ownership. The above apartment was already established with a collective security right equivalent to KRW 61,00,000 in total amount of the claim amount to the Daejeon Saemaul Treasury and H, etc., and it was in a situation that is economically difficult without a certain income or special property. Therefore, even if the Defendant received the deposit from the victim, there was no intention or ability to return the deposit at the time.

Nevertheless, on May 6, 2008, the defendant acquired money from the injured party to the corporate bank account in the name of the defendant as a deposit money.

B. On June 29, 2009, the Defendant would first repay the Defendant’s new security deposit in front of the Daejeon District Court, the Daejeon District Court of Law No. 78, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

In order to recover such money, the Plaintiff borrowed the money to the extent that the expenses are necessary, and would immediately repay the money. The Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff would have paid the money.

However, the defendant is an auction.

arrow