beta
Text
1. It was concluded on June 20, 2013 with respect to 3/13 shares of each real estate listed in the separate sheet between the Defendant and B.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A credit card B used the credit card issued by the Plaintiff from around August 2012, but failed to pay the credit card user fee at the beginning of the use, and on October 15, 2014, the principal and interest amount of the unpaid credit card user fee at KRW 20,934,001.
(1) Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as "each of the instant real estate") shall be referred to as "each of the instant real estate."
The husband C was originally owned by the husband C, and C died on June 4, 2013. As his inheritor, B and the Defendant, D, E, F, and G, the spouse of B and B, and the Defendant, D, E, E, F, and G, on June 20, 2013 (hereinafter “instant division agreement”). On June 21, 2013, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the instant real property on June 4, 2013, based on inheritance by consultation division, as described in paragraph (2) of the main text.
At the time of the division consultation contract of B on the property status of B, there was no particular active property other than the net C’s inherited property including each of the instant real property.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Gap evidence Nos. 4-1 and 2, and fact-finding results of fact-finding with respect to the above fact-finding with respect to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and the Minister of National Court Administration, according to the above fact-finding findings, Eul renounced the right to 3/13 shares of each of the real estate of this case, which is one of its own property through the division consultation agreement of this case, while over obligation exceeds obligation, and thus, it constitutes a fraudulent act and it is ratified by Eul's intention to commit a fraudulent act.
Therefore, the division agreement of this case shall be revoked as a fraudulent act, and the defendant shall register transfer of ownership as stated in Paragraph (2) of this case with respect to the 3/13 share out of each real estate of this case.