A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2015, at the residence of the defendant of Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, 104 Dong-dong, 703, around 06:30 on June 3, 2015, the defendant appealed that he was investigated as the victim of the injury at the police station of the Daejeon Dong-dong, Daejeon, and the defendant called the criminal system of the above police station to cut urban gas line and commit suicide.

After having called “the telephone,” gas emissions urban gas by opening an intermediate valve and cutting urban gas supply heading connected to the gas park.

Accordingly, the defendant released gas and caused danger to human life, body or property, such as neighboring residents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A report on investigation into the area of an apartment and a report on the investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to cut urban gas pipelines;

1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for one year to ten years;

2. The crime of this case (the sentencing guidelines are not set) is a very dangerous act that could cause damage to the body and property of the neighboring residents, in that the defendant easily leaked gas from the supply of urban gas installed in an apartment building, which leads to gas explosion. The crime of this case is not easy in that the crime of this case is a very dangerous act that may cause damage to the human body and property of the neighboring residents.

However, under favorable circumstances, the Defendant did not commit the instant crime for the purpose of breaking his mistake and causing harm to others, the Defendant did not have the same criminal record, the Defendant did not commit the instant crime with the same kind of criminal record, and the Defendant committed the instant crime with a dispute with female friendlys, and the possibility of gas explosion due to the instant crime was high, and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and the means and result of the instant crime.