All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is favorable to the point that he made a confession of each of the instant crimes and reflects his mistake in depth.

On the other hand, the defendant could have been punished for driving alcohol, and the defendant did not know himself while being investigated as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act of the 2017 Highest Order 2078 in the decision of the court below, and committed again a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act of the 2017 Highest Order 2767 in the decision of the court below. At the time of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's alcohol concentration in blood is 0.16% and 0.195% higher than that of the defendant at the time of each of the crimes of this case.

In addition, since there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, the following facts are comprehensively considered in light of the records and various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the background of each of the instant crimes, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it is deemed unfair as it is fluent. Thus, the Defendant

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.