logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.09.17 2014고단436
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 23, 2013, at Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) accessed the Internet site “E” to the “Ninna car page”; (b) posted a letter stating “E” on the bulletin board of the said website; and (c) posted the victim C who reported and contacted the above notice on the Internet hosting to the victim C who sent 1.30,000 won via the Internet hosting.”

However, the defendant did not have a gallon cell phone at the time, and even if he received the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the mobile phone.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 130,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place of the preceding paragraph, posted a letter stating that “a cellphone is sold” on the “Niber”’s “Niber,” and that “a cellphone is sent to 140,000 won if it is remitted” to the victim G who reported and contacted the above notice through Internet hosting.”

However, the defendant did not have an option interview cell phone at the time, and even if he received the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the mobile phone.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 140,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. C’s statement;

1. The deposit certificate and the certificate of transfer [the mobile phone (H) in which the victims sent text messages to the seller at the time of the middle and middle mobile phone transactions in this case is the mobile phone in which the Defendant actually used, and the ID used to carry them with the victim (E also has been used by the Defendant).

arrow