logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.03 2019나36430 (1)
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”). The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

나. 피고 차량은 2018. 3. 6. 23:40경 혈중알콜농도 0.071%의 술에 취한 상태로 서울 서초구 양재동에 있는 경부고속도로 상행선 양재나들목 합류지점의 편도 5차로 중 5차로를 시속 약 130Km의 속도로 진행하던 중, 별지 사고현장 약도와 같이 양재나들목 진입차로를 통하여 경부고속도로에 진입하면서 5차로로 진로변경을 한 원고 차량의 좌측 후면 부분을 피고 차량의 우측 앞 휀더 부분으로 충격하였고, 그 충격으로 원고 차량은 위 도로 우측 가드레일과 교각에 충돌한 후 튕겨져 나와 회전하면서 원고 차량의 앞 범퍼 부분으로 4차로를 진행 중이던 E 차량과 다시 충돌하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On April 9, 2018, the Plaintiff returned KRW 150,000 to the proceeds from the sale of the remainder of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and paid KRW 15,250,000 as insurance proceeds until April 18, 2018 according to the said insurance contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the instant accident was caused by the total negligence of Defendant vehicle driven at about 130 K km in speed exceeding the speed limit under the influence of alcohol.

Since the Plaintiff acquired by subrogation the right to claim damages against the Defendant by the Plaintiff’s driver in accordance with the main sentence of Article 682(1) of the Commercial Act, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 15,100,000 (=insurance money of KRW 15,250,000 - Proceeds of remaining Articles 150,000) and delay damages.

B. Summary of the Defendant’s assertion

arrow