1. Of the distribution schedule prepared on November 20, 2014 in the distribution procedure A with the Goyang District Court High Court, the defendant is against the defendant.

There is no dispute between the parties that the distribution schedule, as shown in the attached Form, was prepared in the case of distribution procedure A by the High Government District Court Goyang Branch A.

However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence No. 6 and the argument, the Seoul High Court Decision 2013Na44197 against the Defendant’s comprehensive terminal repair business entity rendered a judgment that “the service charges that the Defendant would pay to the Defendant shall be KRW 273,936,318, and the service charges that the Defendant would pay to the Defendant shall be 6% per annum from December 15, 201 to September 25, 2014, and the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from the next day to the next day of the payment,” and the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed on April 13, 201, and the fact that the judgment became final and conclusive can be acknowledged.

Therefore, as of November 20, 2014, the date on which the distribution schedule was prepared, the Defendant’s amount of credit as of November 20, 2014, is KRW 328,093,152 (principal KRW 273,936,318, KRW 54,156,834). Therefore, the distribution schedule should be revised accordingly.

[Provided, the distribution procedure case where the debtor is a comprehensive terminal high-level corporation was 3 cases (U.S. High-level District Court No. 2, A, and C). However, in the distribution procedure of Goyang Branch B, the court of execution shall distribute the remainder after deducting the dividends received by the plaintiffs and the defendant as the amount of credit in the distribution procedure of Goyang Branch A, Goyang Branch A, Goyang Branch A, and prepare a distribution schedule in order by distributing the remainder after deducting the dividends received by the plaintiffs and the defendant as the amount of credit in the above procedure, and in the above case, the distribution schedule is corrected in the same manner as in the above case: Provided, That in the case where the bankruptcy trustee of the Bankrupt Savings Bank Co., Ltd. has raised an objection on the date of distribution, but did not file a lawsuit of demurrer to distribution, the distribution schedule distributed to him shall be deemed final and conclusive, and the remaining amount shall be in proportion to each amount of credit by making the amount of