logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고단2192
범인도피교사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On September 13, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the resident support of the Daegu District Court. On January 24, 2011, the same court was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On April 24, 2012, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On May 2, 2012, the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 2, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 8 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (license without a license) at the Daegu District Court on May 1, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 04:30 on September 3, 2013, the Defendant driven C Ecoo motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.150% without a vehicle driver’s license on the roads of carbon shot, shot, shot, and shot, shot, and shot, located in the Gu-U.S.A. In addition, the Defendant driven C-coo motor vehicle without a vehicle driver’s license.

2. On September 6, 2014, the Defendant found the Defendant at the time of the foregoing paragraph (1) 301, and caused the Defendant to escape from the offender by making a false statement to the said E at the transportation investigation team of the Gu and the U.S. police station located in the Dong-si, U.S., U.S., Seoul, to the effect that he/she driven the said E-car to the effect that he/she driven the said E-car by driving the said E-car. In addition, the Defendant instigated the offender by making a false statement to the assistant F of the said police station to the effect that he/she driven the said E-car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E police interrogation protocol;

1. Each police statement of the defendant, G, and E;

1. Statement of G police officer statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Report on detection of a host driver, and report on the status of a host driver;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Previouss before ruling: Criminal history records, investigation reports, confirmation of the same kind of force, and relays to the appellate court of the case charged with detention.

arrow