The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (unfair sentencing) is as follows: (a) in light of the following: (b) the Defendant’s crime of this case was committed from June 2016 to July 2016 by using mobile phone cameras in his history to take pictures of the victim’s legs, traw, traw, and the inner inside and outside of the mouth on several occasions; and (c) the Defendant did not compensate for the damage, the lower court’s sentence that sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 4,00,000, ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for twenty-four hours, and ordered to complete the program and confiscated the confiscation of the sexual assault treatment program

2. In full view of the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal, even if considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unfasible and unfair, given that there is no record of criminal punishment, and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.