logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.10.13 2015구합74067
직접생산확인취소처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s revocation disposition of direct production verification against the Plaintiff on September 15, 2015 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

A. On-site visit investigation (a surveyer: Defendant H, Korea Electric Industry Cooperatives I, Interview: Plaintiff J, technical research institute president K, and competent L) was conducted. As a result, at the time of the instant on-site investigation in 2014, it was confirmed that the on-site investigation was conducted at the instant factory No. 2, and the Defendant sent an official document stating the following to the Plaintiff on January 28, 2015 after the said on-site visit investigation.

Title: Notification of the results of on-site visit investigation to verify whether direct production has been violated

1. Omitted;

2. Omission;

(a) On-site visit and inspection;

(b) Results of the on-site visit survey;

(c) When filing a request for re-application for the verification of direct production for a direct production factory (C) after returning a certificate of direct production that was issued by a plan for measures, it shall conduct a fact-finding survey to a neighboring place, other than a production factory that has applied for the verification of direct production in compliance with the standards for direct production. The submission of a statement of guidance for the visit of the research institute (C) to a neighboring place (C) other than a production factory that has applied for the verification of direct production in compliance with the principle of 6 sub-committee) * The submission of a statement of guidance for the visit of the research institute (C) is necessary for reasonable response to civil petition (C) after examining the report from the company and the research institute

G. On February 9, 2015, the Plaintiff returned the instant certificate of 2014 to the Defendant. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant planned to revoke the confirmation of direct production as to the instant certificate of 2014 pursuant to Article 11 of the Act on Support for Development of Agricultural and Fishing Villages. As such, the Plaintiff sent a public notice to the Plaintiff on March 16, 2015 for attendance at the hearing.

Title: Notification of action plans, such as revocation of direct production verification, and request for reference to hearings;

1. Omitted;

2. In relation to reporting of violation of direct production of a return company, the verification of direct production of a return company pursuant to Article 11 of the Act on Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and Development of Market Support

arrow