1. No. 323 of the 2014 Certificate by the Defendant’s notary public against C is a notarial deed with the legal capacity of the law firm.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 1, 2014, the Defendant entered into a monetary loan agreement with a debtor C with the following terms, and entered into a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement (No. 323, 2014, No. 323, hereinafter “instant notarial deed”).

Article 1 (Purpose) The obligee lent KRW 1,000,000 to the obligor on November 17, 2014, and the obligor borrowed it.

Article 2 (Period and Method of Payment) The payment deadline shall be December 8, 2014.

Article 3 (Interest) Interest shall be 25% per annum.

Article 5 (Compensation for Delay) If the debtor delays the repayment of principal or interest, he/she shall pay damages for delay at the rate of 30% per annum for the delayed principal or interest.

B. On January 8, 2015, the Defendant issued an execution clause with respect to the instant notarial deed, and executed a compulsory execution (hereinafter “instant compulsory execution”) that seizes each movable listed in the separate sheet in the Ulsan-gun D and A(A) Dong 212 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) on January 20, 2015.

C. E is the owner who completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant apartment on March 9, 2012, and the Plaintiff is the mother of the above E and C.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In addition to the whole purport of the pleadings, the following facts and circumstances may be recognized in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5, and 6 (including each number):

The plaintiff and the above C together resided in Ulsan-gun F.

B. After marriage with G on November 13, 2009, the above C completed the move-in report as the H apartment 107 Dong 1402, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, on June 17, 2010.

C. Since April 19, 2012, the Plaintiff was a director from the Ulsan-gunFF, Ulsan-gun, and completed the move-in report on the instant apartment owned by the Plaintiff’s wife, E, and has been residing until now.

On the other hand, the above C also move-in report on the apartment of this case.