1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 21, 1955, the registration of ownership preservation was completed with respect to forest E 6 YY E, Gyeonggi-gun, and 6 Madan1, and on October 20, 1955, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of G with respect to the portion of 1/3 of the above land.

B. On November 18, 1970, the deceased G completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the sale of the entire co-ownership share of F and H with respect to the Jin-gun E Forest No. 25-1, which is the mother land of the instant land (hereinafter “finite land”). On June 22, 1973, the land of this case was divided from the land of the above mother land.

C. On June 29, 1973, the deceased I, the father of the defendant B, completed the registration of ownership transfer of the land of this case under the name of the defendant B on June 25, 1973, and the defendant B has kept so far the sale certificate stating that the deceased G sells the land of this case to the defendant B and the registration certificate thereof (registration certificate).

In October 16, 1954, Defendant B’s her father died on or around October 16, 1954, and the instant land was installed with the deceased J’s grave and was removed to another place in around 2009.

E. On the instant land, a grave with the parents of Defendant C is installed.

F. The Plaintiff died in around 1981. On May 15, 1995, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of sale on November 21, 1980 by means of the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 4502, effective. hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) with respect to the land of the 1982m2, 736m2, 10612m2, 734m2, 734m2, 419m2, 419m2, 419m2, 000,000,000,000m2, prior to P, 2960m29m2.

[Reasons for Recognition: Evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(ii)each entry in Eul evidence of sub-paragraph (1) through (5) or the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments;

2. Ex officio determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the title truster, who held the instant land in title trust to the deceased G, is a valid title truster who held the title trust with respect to the instant land.