A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed at the Kostco Coco store store located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-si, 38, the store was stolen by means of inserting the store without calculating the amount of KRW 118,380,00, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 74,90,000 in the market price owned by the victim Costco Co., Ltd., Ltd.; (b) 1,000,000 won in the market price of KRW 32,490 in the market price; and (c) 1,18,380 in the market price of KRW 10,90 in the market price of KRW 10,90 in the store, which was in possession of property of KRW 118,380 in the store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. A receipt for damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation [the scope of recommending punishment] The sentence is to be rendered as ordered in consideration of the following factors: (a) the basic area of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act / [the decision of sentencing in six months to one year and six months] (the decision of sentence] the background and method of the crime of the defendant; (b) the value of stolen goods; (c) the circumstances after the crime was committed (the damaged goods have been returned); (d) the defendant's attitude of reflectivity and his previous offense relationship (it is possible that the history of punishment for the same type of crime exceeds the fine, but there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine); and